Theology Rocks Show #34 - "Disagreements - Christians have them, and we should allow Christians to have them"

We're not sure why we don't get more comments. Sometimes we'll get a few on the site, a few via email, and a couple personal comments. Some of the people I occasionally accuse of not listening (family members and close friends) give me feedback in person/over the phone, but they won't put it in writing. Sometimes Dan and I get discouraged by the lack of dialog.... (shrug)

Thanks for the comment, and encouragement. It's encouraging just to know that "Anonymous" found it worth your time to listen!

Hypocrites always agree with anyone at church and disagree with
everyone out side of church!

I'm not a fan of Joyce Meyers. However, the judgmental comments by anonymous and others need to be addressed. In fact, one of the rules of disagreeing is to cease the name calling, judgmental statements and the "Since you disagree with me there must be something wrong with you." attiitude. Yes, Jesus used words like hypocrites, etc. He was perfect and had that right. Paul, speaking by the guidance of God also made judgmental statements. But, oh Brothers, we need to be oh so careful about judgmental attitudes. They do come back on us like a boomerang. The scriptures are plain about that.
Plus, I sense an undertone of disparity, disgust and distrust toward churches in general. Please don't forget that Christ loves his church dearly (with all its blemishes) and he died to cover those blemishes with his blood. To keep harping on the shortcomings of churches and their failure to fulfill their purpose, is like throwing mud-balls at the bride of Christ. Take care, my friends.
So, should we remain quiet if we feel an error needs to be pointed out? As Paul would say, "By no means." Bathe concerns in prayer. Compare to scriptures and maybe point out those scriptures. Approach with love and deep deep concern. But first and foremost wrestle with the "log" in our eyes and that should keep us busy enough to leave others alone.
And then, I understand people might not want their names tied to such unkind statements or judgmental attitudes. But I wonder, is it wise to print what "anonymous" writes? If your main purpose is to have a discussion, maybe so. However, if the piece contains name calling and disparaging remarks perhaps they should be backed up by a name. Just a thought.
Again, I guess we're back to what is truth? The unkind statements may be true but remember we were told to speak the truth in LOVE.
Well, I said more than enough. And I sign my name.
In Christ,
Charlotte Wheat